Smallmouth Bass in the BWCA: Demand, Meet Supply

By Mark Neuzil

Smallmouth bass are among the most popular sport fish in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, possibly trailing only walleye in time, money and legend among today’s anglers. But this wasn’t always the case. As often happens in history, the rise in popularity of smallmouth bass reflects a combination of intentional efforts by both professional and amateur (“bucket”) biologists, as well as the compromises and regulatory gaps shaped by political considerations.

The story begins in the early decades of the 20th century, when sport fishing, along with hunting, became a leading attraction for visitors to canoe country, many of whom were enjoying more leisure time with the development of a large middle class and increased transportation options (roads, cars, fly-in resorts, outboard motors) to get them to lakes in northern Minnesota and southern Canada. Outdoor magazines such as Field & Stream and Forest & Stream, which merged in 1930, sensing a demand among their audiences, began to employ freelance writers who wove tales of giant fish in undiscovered waters available to those who wished to throw out a line. These monsters were typically northern pike, with walleye, lake trout and sturgeon running in the top tier. A 45-pound Minnesota record pike caught in Basswood Lake in 1929 added to its legend.

There were no tall tales about catching the world’s largest smallmouth bass in canoe country for the straightforward reason that there were no smallmouth bass in canoe country. They are not native to the region. That was about to change in the late 1930s.

Local civic boosters, outfitters, guides, freelance writers and ordinary fishermen – with the help of professional scientists – sought to increase the scope of fishing options for growing numbers of visitors. Walleye, lake trout and especially sturgeon, as turned out, could be quite difficult to catch for the novice and experienced angler alike, and the city-bred client who read lengthy accounts of stringers of giant fish (and saw photographs of massive catches piled strategically in front of outfitters’ signs – some things never change) wanted in on the action.

Enter the smallmouth bass. There is some evidence that white settlers hauled smallmouth from the Mississippi River system into the nearby Lake of the Woods around 1900, and the Ontario Provincial government sanctioned the practice in 1901. But the stocking effort in what was to become the Boundary Waters didn’t take off until almost 40 years later.

Among those who participated in the stocking – at the urging of the president of the fishing-focused Isaak Walton League – was the Ely author and activist Sigurd Olson, who had a graduate degree in animal ecology but also owned an outfitting business that catered to fishermen. “If they take here the way they took in the Lake of the Woods country, we will really have something to be proud of,” Olson wrote of the bass. He brought the first smallmouth shipments to Basswood and Knife lakes in 1940.

Most of the stocked fish came from the Mississippi watershed, and soon boosters and resort owners were all in on the introduction of the new species. The fish are hardy enough to survive transport, rookie anglers can catch them in the heat of the summer, and as it turns out, they spread like melting butter on hot toast. The rocky, clear waters of the Canadian shield lakes were a perfect habitat.

As with the introduction of any non-native species into a new ecosystem, there are winners and losers. The losers in the case of the smallmouth stocking were the mature lake trout and northern pike, who lived in smaller lakes. The life cycle of the smallmouth hurt trout and pike, but an important culprit was the additional fishing pressure in the small lakes that grew those native species to large sizes. More anglers appeared, and more kept and killed larger pike and trout, even while fishing for smallmouth. In the meantime, walleye populations dropped for two decades, but cooler summer temperatures seem to be as responsible as bass predation of walleye young. Miron Heinselman, the biologist who authored the definitive book on the BWCA ecosystem, wrote: “The final outcome of recent introductions is unknown.” The answers are not always easy.

Jump ahead to 1993. A new management plan from the U.S. Forest Service regulated everything from visitor quotas to acceptable transportation systems, including a rule that only native fish can be stocked in BWCA waters. That might have put the kibosh on smallmouth stocking, but for a loophole bigger than a torn gill net. The plan allowed that non-native fish (smallmouth and some trout) could be restocked if they were previously stocked before 1964. That was the year that the federal government established the Wilderness Act, the forerunner to the BWCA, which contained the usual number of compromises to get it passed. The 1993 stocking update, with its 1964 exception, became known as the smallmouth bass provision among forest service employees.

To be fair to Olson and others who dropped smallies into BWCA waters in the 1940s, they may have justified it by knowing that the bass, while introduced to the Arrowhead region, were common across the rest of Minnesota. And perhaps some had second thoughts. In 1952, Olson supported a law banning live minnows carried into Canada as “undesirable fish” and a “biological hazard.” But he was silent on the smallmouth bass stocking for the rest of his career.

In the end, the Boundary Waters wilderness ecosystem of 2026 is not the ecosystem of 1901, but no ecosystem is.

Photo Credit: Wisconsin Historical Society “Stocking Fish” Conservation advocate Sigurd F. Olson stocking smallmouth bass in the canoe country near the Minnesota-Canadian border {Sigurd F. and Elizabeth Olson papers, 1916-2003}

Categorised in: Blog, Fishing, News